The Facts About Dianetics Uncovered

 

I couldn't ever not intend to get anything that enters your mind for you- if it was otherwise, I would not be sitting below with you, doing this. I not only can never have an issue, or otherwise wish to hear something that enters your mind for you, but I'm entirely eager to recognize every concept, every thought, every photo or feeling that arises or manifests for you- do not ever assume or else, and if somehow you do, please simply allow me understand! Sometimes, you may have an idea, and image, idea or case appear that does not appear to address the question, or connect to it, but nonetheless, constantly do tell me about it, and as we continue, the relevance will arise for you.


This is fundamental in the basis of handling, and the subject of this conversation: the basic duties of the counselor and the customer: The standard role of the counselor is, as opposed to "conventional training", not to control, which means to impose and/or inhibit, however to instead work from the basis of EMPOWERING THE CLIENT.

 

 

 

In subjective processing, regardless of what was stated in one's training materials, the cpu is not there "to control" the client. However, the cpu is there to give the customer the flexibility and undistracted focus to process and reveal what materializes, and what shows up is what emerges when the customer attends to the product that associates with their very own objectives for the processing, and for their life.

 

 

 

Dianetics for Beginners

John Mcmasters expressed this basic reality splendidly well in among his talks on Power processing, where he discusses exactly how he was asked what this "unique propensity" was that he had for providing such wonderful sessions; he needed to think regarding that for a moment, and found that it was what he had not been doing, as well as what he was doing: he wasn't assessing, judging, computing, or actually, generating any type of ideas, not to mention spoken expressions, after offering the command and while waiting for the computer to finish their solution to their complete satisfaction; he was, just and only, being present with the PC, and totally interested.




The function of the counselor, demonstrated; that was his "special propensity". I have had my own experience which instructed me this well, very at an early stage in the game. In 1982, having recently finished my training and teaching fellowship on New Period Dianetics, websites I was running this on a COMPUTER, and there was a factor in the session where (being a bit wet behind the ears not yet having numerous hours under my belt as a specialist auditor) the PC appeared to be "taking too long" to share anything verbally after I gave him a command.


This key ended up being one of the most useful contribution that John ever before made to the subject of treatment or bookkeeping (Dianetics). In my humble point of view, it is the best contribution that anybody has actually ever before made to these subjectsthe application is completely non-judgemental, non-evaluative, and lacking any type of idea, guidance or opinion.no preconditioned schedule for individuals, or 'levels' that they must do


In Scientology we prided ourselves on not reviewing for individuals. All that really suggested was that the auditor did not VERBALLY examine for the PC in session.

 

 

 

Examine This Report on Dianetics

 

The Scientology Bridge is exceptionally evaluative and judgmentalAt initially, we liquid chalked up the difference in results to John's my blog improvisational abilities and experience. However, upon more investigation, certain elements came to lightIt was not a matter of what he WAS doing that the various other practitioners weren't, however instead what he WASrefraining from doing that they were.


Any person who had ever seen John audit might not assist but observe an unique high quality in his auditing."The customer's basic function is to be there with the function of relocating in the instructions of their spiritual goals, and to freely and completely reveal and experience whatever manifests for them in responding to the concerns and carrying out the guidelines in the handling.


This is something to process as needed. But also, people regularly have prior experience and/or indoctrination in auditing/processing which, somehow, and to some levels, in fact misinforms them right into attitudes, concepts and habits patterns that protect against the complete understanding of these functions, and so they will have a tendency to prevent the expressing of what comes to mind, as in the examples given over. * The first, and probably foremost instances of mis-indoctrination causing much less than entirely smooth and effective sessions, can be found in particular facets of the training routines, or "TR's":"TR's" are usually a person's very first, or at the very least early, experience in Scientology, and while I will go on to clarify what I see as the defects in idea and technique, however, have a tendency to be greatly healing, done as they are offered (Hubbard firmly insists that "TR's resource are not processing, they are training", however factually, they are both handling AND training)


Alan Walter made comparable observations, and enhanced these with his "Visibility Processes". There is no "failing", and no rejection of the reality of this being handling. The emphasis, as it should be, gets on experiencing the other person's visibility. All the symptoms which obtain a "flunk" in doing "TR-0" are just the being's efforts to stand up to the other individual's existence, and instead than being pestered and pestered with "Flunk", which imposes "failure!" on the being, one just needs to be motivated to "stick their feet in the water a little much deeper", to increasingly refurbish their capability and determination to fully share and experience "being right here", or "presence", with others.

 

 

 

Getting The Dianetics To Work

 

I wait until the client checks out me as if to claim "I'm done answering, over to you, what's next?" As long as the client is looking somewhere else than back at the counselor, they are still refining the question or command. Bear in mind "a silent auditor invites itsa"; the client is still refining, until their attention plainly returns to the therapist.